D a are the self-appointed media watchdogs of NDR Zapp in their four-week summer break, the time seems opportune to take a small summary of recent months.
Incessantly trying to Zapp, apparently to meet the perceived mission, the apparently clear up for quite immature and dependent citizens held. So you will not tire to get worked into almost any program on any headline in the image as if it could be used to lure someone else behind the stove. At the latest, since an alias Hans Esser Günter Wallraff looked 30 years ago in Hanover image behind the scenes and reported on, actually all know how the system works image in its fundamentals. The paid circulation of the image goes back beyond obviously continuous one , so why this fear mongering? There is also an image blog is where the false representations of the image well documented and placed correctly.
It is, moreover, one of the easiest and most convenient pseudo-intellectual exercises, the image retrieval errors, inconsistencies or similar demonstrated. This is about like trying to prove the NDR every week anew that he should finance themselves through user fees. Ultimately it is the image of Zapp's criticism as to be no further charges of money-financed glass beads gimmick - a self-purposive, vain and fiddling with uninspired cliches. Besides: The intersection of the image-readers and the audience, aimed at Zapp apparently is conceivable small. It thus contributes to their viewers owls to Athens. The image reader, however, are not sooner.
Well, Zapp at least served in a beautiful regularity from the image Blog fundus, which is now to describe not just as research in the strict sense, as Zapp always demands from all other media and himself attached as a quality to her chest. Rather cheap and can be pleasantly uncomplicated fill air time by a film image blog entries. The Picture Blog founder Stefan Niggemeier is evident in his personal blog by the way it clearly unnerved that Zapp regular picture blog entries sometimes even filmed, unless otherwise specified. He called Zapp therefore not exactly unjustified even as an image blog TV. The addition of Niggemeier expressed a clear suspicion that in the course of his films Zapp also stealing ideas from him, and at best only small variations are concerned, can that be when Zapp the difference between copyright and copyleft does not know. Sure, "researched" Zapp but also even in the picture.
Otherwise Zapp often seems as trailer-show for Monitor, Panorama, Report Mainz and at extra3. The researched and produced reports from those programs will be shown in short form by Zapp. At the end of which is pointed out that one can see the full contribution of their colleagues in the broadcasts. Or you can send contributions, which have long since gone elsewhere. This kind of reminds cheaper secondary use arg to the annoying cross-promotion practice of commercial stations. But here is where your own research, for which one is knocking himself so much on the shoulder? Is this the sort of "journalistic deep hole," with the network search eV to award its prize "lighthouse for special journalistic achievements" two -founded? Such kind of thin board drills journalism should Haberbusch Kuno, a board member of the Network Research Association and Zapp editor and self-promotion, according to the "King of the research," but does not allow in their own mission. As for the self-imposed standards of the network, it is possible and even its chairman, Thomas Leif to come under criticism because he is with he postulated importance of separation of PR and journalism, with the correct citation of the intellectual property of others, with the non-manipulative use of facts and research methods themselves with anything but seriously 3 . This is a right back but its so true with Heinrich Heine verse one:
I know the way, I know the text,
I know also the author of Men;
I know they secretly drank wine
And publicly preached water. 4
In terms of equity research from Zapp to, for example the alleged scandal revelations in the case referred Senait Mehari. 5 This is so Zapp, no child soldier was, her book is full of contradictions and errors. Zapp has caused so no doubt a little scandal. However, as regards the research of the magazine and the appointed of his witnesses, so the opinions are very divided. One could almost assume that the managers were hoping with her article about the "questionable media star" Mehari, to finally break through the media and their questionable magazine from the shadows of the Third Programme 6 to heave into the first program. Once you no longer guests may invite into the program, the shag and the screen fireplace or-aquarium painted and were only two cameras are available appear to be, you obviously believes in Zapp, having to raise by hook or by crook the impression that essential be to ensure that the consignment is not quite the red pen to fall victim.
Once in the Life dogged it, therefore the claim that Mehari had invented her life as a child soldier in Eritrea released and was subsequently while also constructively expressed counter-arguments, among others, senior editors of international and cultural departments of the WDR, NDR, the FAZ and the Frankfurter Rundschau inaccessible. A year previous research can be said to be finally not me anything you nothing real damper by any counter-arguments, and they are still so reasonable. And if one party does not have the others, then you at least knock yourself on the back. Sun praised to be in your own program that is "caught between the fronts media" or even "the media" is. They measured their own success more clearly on the size of the triggered turbulences, as to the validity of the claims made. Solely from the formation of fronts by the first broadcast, but you would have to draw for the second mission also concluded that the truth lies somewhere in the middle.
So rather than consider that you have gone too far, perhaps, and also the track as "witnesses" presented persons may some interests you have in the previous week in a 10:57 min long contribution expressed charges against Mehari, the media and the publisher - even in a time - totally unmoved by all the criticism voiced by Zapp on since 12:34 min long post again. When voices are raised in some places, the claim that could be discussed at least since the second show them that Zapp Mehari slandering campaign-like, no one should be surprised.
It may still be acceptable if a Zapp campaign is against a large news magazine, as against the current Focus 7 . But why must Zapp his fight against the insignificance on the back of a mediocre major author unsubscribe? Given at Zapp know that some members of ELF or people who played in the 70s in a responsible role in Eritrea, may have an interest might have in mind that not all the details of their role in the Eritrean War of Independence are known? Perhaps Meharis statements just conveniently not for everyone, the then already grown up, or was the same age.
If Mehari describes how she was repeatedly raped in the camp for older boys brutally ("Often I could barely stand up after such a night when one or more came to me. It roared and squirmed in my gut.") 8 , would those persons likely to underscore hardly, let alone on camera 9 , but deny everything. On the subject of "sexual abuse" Zapp lost not a single syllable, moreover, any more than the "witnesses". With regard to the method described by Mehari practice that they had been regularly beaten as punishment for error 10 , is meant to ensure none of the people find that this will confirm frankly.
Be just as well not have to be cruel Come Ande urine described Agawegahta or whatever she was told by Mehari may even admit as equally cruel described male superiors that they have victimized children in the camp, if this were the case, as Mehari says. Suffering from malaria in the camp that Mehari, was among the consequences they suffer today because they had become totally inadequate due to chronic treatment, probably speaks more to the Zapp almost as heavenly conditions described in the camp, against "a Salem in the desert " 11 . It takes almost wonder that Zapp has not yet consulted medical experts, who should take up the proof that this or that detail of the described Mehari malaria symptoms was correct. A psychological evaluation would not be surprised that probably behave themselves Mehari atypical for a rape victim and was therefore perhaps never raped. But either Zapp can not find any doctors who wanted to go to this embarrassing level or the seemingly relatively low threshold of the editorial was still slightly higher than the proscribed image.
This in no way should the claim be set up in all that Mehari write only the truth, because that would mean to step on to the level of Zapp and his worldview apparently manichäistische down, where there are no shades of gray. Rather, it should be noted that falsification of history of experience primarily by action-carrying, thus assumes perpetrators and not victims rather than which describes itself Mehari. A perpetrator role can probably be ruled out in case Mehari, since a sixteen year old girl rather unlikely. In this respect should perhaps be overcome Zapp and the thesis of a possible influence on the part of the Eritrean intelligence witnesses to heart, just like the theory that former perpetrators or accomplices to relativize their actions, deny, or even whitewash. If you are not familiar with Zapp at the phenomenon, for example, that former employees of the Stasi in exhibitions without being asked today about Wall victims hold lectures in which they represent their world view and geschichtsrevisionistisches politically and ideologically motivated interpretative authority over the past claim to be? If you ask a group of former Stasi members, this is hardly confirm the claims of a Stasi victim. 12
Everywhere register respectable votes as the Social Times to speak out and allow yourself to wonder why that occur at Zapp witnesses until now the public were given the fact that we are debating title appeared Fireheart in 2004 and why they are in the group aufträten and speak. It states that: "A spy system of the Eritrean government dominated as far as Germany. No one escapes the Eritreans. "What must be narrow-minded one, that one notices These kinds of shows the reach, as Zapp does it? This Zapp noticed that there was criticism of the book for a long time. There have been discussions on readings, newspaper reports and letters to the editor. Mehari writing about himself in her second book. Journalists would "not take this criticism simply note" want. Journalists? So the journalists of Zapp! The program exists since 2002, Zapp, Mehari book appeared two years later. The question is permissible, why exactly the alerten journalists by Zapp three years have held their report on the "questionable media star" behind the mountain, when fires heart is still so full of contradictions, that the situation envisaged by Zapp "Eritrea expert" Günter Schröder even to the judgment goes so devastating that it is "practically on every page" error in giving Mehari book, "The one really Eritreans, who writes about Eritrea should not happen," 13 . Why Zapp is left unchallenged all the uncritical reports of Mehari for years, but when the contradictions and errors were so obvious?
Arnd Henze WDR Zapp points out that there is evidence of massive pressure from the Eritrean intelligence admit, was to prevent the Eritrean extras which, in Nairobi on casting for participating in the planned film version of Heart of Fire. In parallel to the loud criticism in Germany Mehari book will be, and perhaps also be seen in this context. Henze expresses the impression that this orchestrated criticism seems to go on. Against this background, he considered it "is extremely questionable, the eritretischen critics Ms. Mehari unquestioningly characterized as to witnesses' and helps to give evidence." - "Witness" said Henze are "neutral, going from a long brutal civil war, however, all as' stakeholders' out. "Finally, Henze perfectly legitimate question whether Zapp may be liable for" a cynical historical revisionism 'do the clamp. 14
"Against a piece - in the sense of, audiatur et altera pars" - which shows a group of people who doubt the veracity of a book vehemently, "do not mind, writes Christopher Bungartz, head of the NDR" cultural journal "," in contrary. " One such piece was not just sent Zapp. Bungartz certified Zapp in its reporting "foaming at the mouth." 15 One wonders how this foam is due. It seems almost as if someone had to settle a personal score with Zapp at Mehari.
Regarding the "eyewitnesses" balances informed 16 that it had "interviewed a number of Eritreans", "who were in the same camp," - "you live in Sweden, Germany and Norway. You have a family, a decent job and some long some other nationality. "Woman balances, one can only hope that this confused logic does not apply to some 1945 to Argentina expatriate Germans, perhaps family, has a decent job and has long been the Argentine citizenship. So now you want to prove that the Argentines may have been a Nazi? Have been Adolf Eichmann may therefore not a Nazi, because he had a family and a "decent" job at Daimler Benz Argentina? 17 .
As evidence of the independence of the presented "witnesses" - balances now informs you that have known "of many Eritreans interviewed [...] from our inquiries nothing of each other" - even from each other. The sounds in connection with the foregoing somewhat illogical. Why are the Eritreans knew it not, when they were supposedly all in the same camp yet? - Apart from that, it's the attention of women apparently escaped balances that just exile communities that are scattered all over the world, are well connected with each other. In addition, as perceived Nestbeschmutzer people are accused of lying independently by several groups. Furthermore boasts balances have also asked other Eritreans, for example, those who have been active in fighting against the ELF EPLF. None of them consider to be credible, which describe in their book Senait. But what woman balances, a EPLF fighters please know how it happened in an ELF-bearing, but if there was war between the two organizations? The same question will also need to respect those Eritreans who were no fighters, the woman approached balances still draws as witnesses.
Like a mantra is repeated at Zapp with a wagging finger in relation to other colleagues from the former evening news presenter Hanns Joachim Friedrichs established premise that you know a good journalist because he did not mean do a thing, not even with a good, that he everywhere it is, but nowhere to belong. Zapp has, however, in the case Mehari chosen a side and made it the mouthpiece. Zapp It seems to be less to go around the truth, but rather a question of law to have and keep them. Here, the Zapp was quoted in the show, 4.7.2007, and of course once again to other colleagues coined little wisdom to heart, according to which is the knowledge of journalists far as the sea but deep as a puddle. This is exactly why you should let the experts take the opposite side, perhaps seriously, and above all the chance to speak only once. On the website of Stefan Niggemeier is incidentally a revealing article titled "Experts at Zapp-casting" . It describes Niggemeier from personal experience how quickly Zapp sometimes waive experts, if they do not verträten the desired opinion. This seems now to be anything other than open-ended research and to meet well suited to the credibility of Zapp with a little skepticism.
Even if everything should vote the way it claims Zapp, the question arises, why the person must be treated in such a hateful Mehari and malicious manner. Had the same image allows nemesis, the Zapp-makers would like to blog the first picture was that it would have echauffiert. Since the charge would have read that you intend to drive at the expense of a defenseless person to contact in the air. When Zapp is very likely that you wanted to distinguish themselves at the expense of a single person to drive the audience into the air, at issue, of course, even if not-NDR director Jobst Plog his protective hand over the creature Zapp holds .
In very imperious manner and unbending belief in the infallibility of their own to return a millimeter more of the time-related position, although quite a number of serious voices spoke up, the Zapp disagreed. Such behavior is known otherwise more rigid age of Radicals. How much you have to envy their success Mehari, to argue in such a way wortklauberischer to the definition of the term "child soldier"? Even if their success Mehari deliberate misrepresentations might owe, is very questionable whether it is the job of a media magazine, addressed to that person or even to destroy it. To discredit Mehari also means discredit to their involvement as an ambassador of the campaign and their children emergency coordination German child soldiers. Zapp is of course also penetrated into these organizations and their representatives have individual confronted with his "scandalous revelations". This relatively unmoved and expressed unanimously that they still gave Mehari before faith.
The opinion cited by Zapp Jan Feddersen, according to the lie of course, just that in Germany, "basically the strongest donor market in the world" and that all natural "totally keen on" were to win, "a woman like Senait Mehari to can. " 18 This man was originally intended to write history was Mehari, but probably not as "keen on" and let it remain, ostensibly because Mehari have no additional sources can demonstrate. He acts like someone who is now - given a paid circulation of 400,000 pieces - actually excessively annoyed, then not to have had the right instinct, and grateful for the purposes of their own face-saving in all of a sudden emerged Zapp cameras inside says that he had always said that there was something wrong. Much better, he published books such as: "A song can be a bridge - The German and international history of the Grand Prix € vision." On this subject, there are at least several sources to draw from which to choose. Thus, he has nevertheless not a "history afrikaverheulte dramas" 19 written, but still a schlagerverheulte drama history. Apparently it is what Feddersen meant by a "cast-iron journalistic project" for which he saw no potential for Mehari. So much Feddersen version.
The Berliner Zeitung of 24.02.2007 there is a slightly different version of the Munich-based literary agent Lianne Kolf, which became aware of Mehari story and contacted her, was because she thought that she would be a good material for a book. Mehari Feddersen had proposed as a possible ghostwriter. This was rejected "due to time" and not listed as a reason for his refusal that he find the story unbelievable, as he then claimed to Zapp. Even if something would turn on the Zapp-reproach, it would not detract from the work Meharis Kindernothilfe. Sure would Meharis credibility into question asked, or at least damaged, if the allegations were true Zapp. But no one is helped if they hinder the work of this organization to bring the truth about some second-rate quality bestseller to light. Mehari has with the procedure of complaint to their oh-so-unfair "victim status" harmed anyone, but used their popularity among other things sprang from it is extremely useful aid projects. Also, the "strongest donor market" has "abused" Mehari popularity for good causes.
The truth about Mehari is by no means of such public interest, such as having a Günter Grass, whose books are on school reading, influenced generations and created great literature. With him, it would be of course to learn about public interest, whether he has joined the SS voluntarily or under coercion, and whether and to what extent he has been guilty of acts beyond purely military.
Maybe you had hoped for but at Zapp to have unearthed a similar case, as he revealed in 2003 with a title of Hoffmann and Campe Verlag in Hamburg. Here namely the seemingly autobiographical fiction book in the middle of Africa, the author Ulla Ackermann was soon exposed as a forgery, whereupon the publishers all copies of the book trade called back and reported to disappointed owners of the book on demand their money back. This is the case of the Zapp Droemer Knaur-published book publisher failed to secure the great chagrin of the Zapp employees.
Mehari was about six years old at the time to tell them about the history. Who can take seriously, that a then six year old now correctly remembers all the events? Who can seriously remonstrate with her, if she flora and fauna of their whereabouts is not properly described in detail? Zapp can. This is bound to a certain parallel to the great storytellers Aharon Appelfeld. This was once taught that one should write about the Holocaust is not a fiction 20 . But how can today play a then eight-year-old all the details of his experiences correctly, if he may not even be able to read correctly? His story is therefore less valuable? No! Should he not tell his story because of it? But! Appelfeld has not ultimately be put off, and in a variety of excellent books impressively testified. The most important experiences he has kept. Namely, his mother being killed by Romanian anti-Semites, as he and his father were deported to concentration camps by the Nazis, as he managed to escape and he lived three years alone in the woods. If he afterwards an animal, a tree or a berry describe wrong, that's probably because he did not know the age of eight, as they are called correctly or that important at this time was different. The same applies to geographical indications. This is his story, in any way in question. On the contrary, out of necessity Appelfeld makes a virtue. His stories are reduced to the essentials, you could say. It does, for example, an extremely minor role, as the name of the station was called, at the age of eight, was deported to when it comes to describe the feelings at that moment.
The exact circumstances of the place and time, etc. are important in a historical-scientific term textbook as Goldhagen's "Hitler's willing executioners' but not in a childhood memory. The people who lived through the Holocaust as a child, may not remember certain details, but they provide an invaluable additional perspective by describing, has experienced as a child's emotional suffering. Zapp would also be a nachrecherchieren Aharon Appelfeld to reveal errors in his stories? But with a woman who describes her memories of her time as a six year old girl in the throes of the independence war in Eritrea, researched by Zapp tough. Sure Mehari is otherwise comparable in any way with Appelfeld. The very fact that it writes his own books and has no need to, like Mehari, to let the publisher make a ghostwriter to the side, differs both. Even if you Mehari at Zapp perhaps why they despise, you have no right to be treated like this. A Sally Perel (I was Hitler Youth Salomon) is not a born storyteller, but he was forced by his experiences, to tell his story for posterity, in order to avoid similar for the future and to handle his unwanted experiences. One should be very careful what standards to which it invests book. Frank Nordhausen is rightly established in the Berliner Zeitung that the memory of what has been experienced as a child after such a long time certainly could cause would a cat to the lion, a 15-year old Come Ande urine appear tall and muscular, could that battle, was told by those who could lead to feelings that always battles raged. This in itself is not a new phenomenon, which is why you should have actually attained even at Zapp parties. An example of such perceptions also mention Meharis Ghost Writer Lukas Lessing. He had twice traveled with her to Eritrea and Ethiopia to the scenes of their story to be considered. "Senait had always reported by the huge home of her grandparents - as we were before, she was quite disappointed as it turned out to be a little hut." Lessing, however, have found essentially confirms what I told him about his narrator. You have not only the grandparents house, relatives, orphanages "Orfan" and "Comboni" visits, where employees have even more of them can remember. Lessing was also found that Senaits history have anyone wondered particularly in Eritrea and that "almost everyone had done there in a brutal civil war experiences with violence." The trips have convinced him that, despite some inaccuracies Meharis life story and exaggerations in principle agree. Moreover, notes Lessing, "" Heart of Fire "is a personal story from the perspective of a child and not a historical reference book." Zapp is indeed the autobiography or a biography put on the page so that Mehari finally learns how her life has been indeed.
Zapp then went on with Christina Bjork have a witness gun, which will not conflict with citizens' education seriously can, after all, is the witness in the article as "President of the Swedish educational broadcasting" presented. This was during the war several times visited the camps in Eritrea. At this point, it was not yet president of the way educational television. With what (political?) Motivation, and in whose behalf they did that deliberately conceals Zapp its viewers. Just because the lady today, President / Director of Education's television, but this is by no means a guarantee that you have not fooled you that time or something that she has endorsed some practice time because they may have sympathized with the ELF. A certain Joseph Fischer also had a wild youth, took part in violent activities, and later became foreign minister. Completely independent of what one thinks of fishing, he will be fit for sure not an objective witness of those events. The submitted Björk, from her own photographs taken will ultimately provide the final proof. You can see it only children without arms. So there was no camp in Meharis child soldiers.
But it's really not a new phenomenon that serve those in power and organizations around the world the means of Potjomkinschen villages, to burnish its international image. What the visitor gets presented in North Korea is by no means the true life of the majority of the people, it is possible to start. If you leave it alone Hamas, to present themselves in public, they certainly came to the conclusion that it is one of the most peace-loving organizations in general IN QUESTION. Well, think Björk Zapp, who had visited several times ELF camp, more than Mehari, who was not from time to time to visit, but has lived there for years. Only from above already quoted article in the Berliner Zeitung learns that Christina Bjork at the time was a member of Eritrean Solidarity Committee, visited several children's camps and made a film about it did. Definitive information on their exact motives is thus not even issued. However it is also not the responsibility of the Berlin newspaper to do the job, has missed the Zapp.
Solidarity is often associated with a blindness to certain practices which are accepted as a necessary evil to achieve the objective. So many grievances were dismissed in socialist systems of Western sympathizers as teething problems. Even today, naive pseudo-conformists from the left, worn T-shirts bearing the likeness of the mass murderer Mao. These kinds of people are also called undifferentiated everything good that one drives Fidel Castro and his people, but has enjoyed one of the highest densities of doctors and literacy rates in the world, otherwise you have to suffer to almost all areas of deficiency. It is possible that Christina Bjork was then blinded ideologically. Completely without a source weaves Zapp also some illustrative film footage in the report, some of which even contradict nor the parallel on the soundtrack doubts expressed by Zapp, by showing that is emaciated people and those with weapons, somewhere and sometime in Ethiopia? So much for "transparency love the Zappler" whose Julia balances, the author of "revelation story," praises the website of the show. Transparency could also just heard that it tells, in what capacity was staying Björk in Ethiopia.
Balances asks in its subsequent written opinion or justification on very subjective, polemical and itself disqualifying manner, if she had some to tell you that the situation envisaged by their witness work Mehreteab as a computer scientist with Toll Collect on Potsdamer Platz and the other witness Benifer as private nurse in Munich to meet the demand for transparency. As Ms balances has misunderstood something. Rather would have been interesting, the role of witnesses and how they used to play on their civilian profession also are still active in politics or interests may follow. "In a magazine piece in ten minutes" was "simply too little space to each interviewee to present accurate" counters balances the charge, Zapp had concealed that it was during one of his witnesses is a former ELF cadres. That alone would have been able to show together with his name, which takes no time. But then you would indeed have to explain why this person is still credible, so balances. Right, that would be in this case, then it must do or you would just simply have to come to the conclusion that this person is unsuitable as an objective witness and have to do without them. But Benifer, the name of the witness had to know as a private nurse in Munich yes so popular, "because the patient's level-headed manner and conversation with the educated African Sun underestimated [ed]" lets balances. Even the Bavarian Rundfunk - NDR staff so derided in measureless overestimation else ever - a Portait have sent over Benifer. That supposed to serve as proof that former ELF cadres Benifer says the truth, woman balances? Now you've got so much space on the Zapp side to everything that was not arrived at their ten-minute contribution disclosure for reasons of space, and finally tell your viewers still remain many facts guilty. Instead, you prefer it to justify themselves in lachrymose manner. You do not practice self-criticism, and if so, with so evident irony, that it really is nothing left.
Unprofessional seems irritating to the kind of women defiantly acting Saldens opinion. So you lack "imagination" to think that people who have them "completely trivial" found on their circle of friends, might have something to do with the Eritrean intelligence. Since it sounds like everything. Believe woman balances that she lives in a protection zone that is free from all evil, where only people with white vest have access? It's really unrealistic to think that someone just because you are acquainted with him, has an objective view of events in which he was involved. If wife says balances, that for this recognition, "fantasy" need, is really the question whether, as the impartiality committed journalist suitable for their job. That perhaps some friends while watching TV in the working journalist sensed an opportunity to get public is not entirely far-fetched. That woman in turn balances in the accounts of her friends suspected her big story is just as conceivable.
This is precisely what can very quickly turn into a scenario in which one side can be manipulated by the other and will leave the path of professionalism for the sake of tempting laurels. One can only hope that Zapp at all justified criticism that it is expressed in other media, do not forget who used to strict standards to apply also to yourself. Senait Mehari, Senait G. Mehari, Mehari, Fireheart, Eritrea, ELF, the Eritrean Liberation Front, the Eritrean People's Liberation Front, EPLF, Almaz Yohannes, Agawegatha, Kuno Haberbusch, Julia balances, Peter Disch, Zapp, NDR, Dutton, Sven Burgemeister, Andreas Bareiss, Letekidan Micael, Solomie Micael, Seble Tilahun, Daniel Seyo, Heart of Fire, Picture Blog
© Stefan Fix, 2007
- of 4,509,545 copies in 1998 to 3,444,977 copies 2007th Source: IVW [ ← ]
- in 2004 [ ← ]
- see the collection of sources on Wikipedia . This sourcebook has since been "cleaned up" conspicuous. That's just Wikipedia. Evil tongues whisper, that it is already that in the article is the Wikipedia articles about themselves "is correct", but this opinion is here condemned as a conspiracy theory. So all the allegations made against Mr. Leif are apparently out of thin air. The rubric "criticism" now takes almost as advertising for the person Leif Thomas and the network of research, enriched with a convenient link to the club. Therefore, here is however on the article "That's Leif" by Jörg Jacoby in "concrete" - issue 3/2006 refer. In the archives of "concrete" is fortunately not everyone rewrite the article to his taste. [ ← ]
- Heine, Heinrich: Germany - A Winter's Tale. Zurich 2005, p.12. [ ← ]
- During the broadcast of 14.02.2007 [ ← ]
- Zapp broadcast of 11.07.2007 saw just 130,000 spectators. Source: AGF / GfK TV Research, pc # tv television panel (D + EU), NDR Media Research [ ← ]
- Rants that Zapp extensively so against the focus, may be because Süddeutsche that Hans Leyendecker of the newspaper, which is currently the focus in the clinch member of the board, the network research and thus of course the solidarity reporting his network colleagues and Zapp leaders Kuno can be safely Haberbusch. [ ← ]
- Mehari, G. Senait: Fireheart. Munich 2004, pp. 154-158. [ ← ]
- Incorporated herein by anyone who assumes that occurred at Zapp "eyewitnesses" Thither Oldest something. It's only a matter of principle here. [ ← ]
- Mehari, G. Senait: Fireheart. Munich 2004, 141 [ ← ]
- Frank Nordhausen in the Berliner Zeitung of 24.02.2007 [ ← ]
- Also, it aims to herangezogenenen as the Zapp witnesses persons Thither Oldest nothing can be assumed. [ ← ]
- Source: Zapp broadcast of 14.02.2007. [ ← ]
- Arnd Henze, in a letter dated 20.02.2007 to Zapp [ ← ]
- Christoph Bungartz in a letter to Zapp dated 20.02.2007 [ ← ]
- Source: website of Zapp [ ← ]
- Even at this point is emphasized that no single one of the Eritrean presented at Zapp "witnesses" a role is assumed as the perpetrator. Based on the above comparison is exaggerated only be stated that the "evidence" of women lags balances. [ ← ]
- Source: Zapp broadcast of 21.02.2007. [ ← ]
- Feddersen Zapp on fire in heart [ ← ]
- Appelfeld, Aharon: Story of a Life. Berlin 2005, p.129. [ ← ]
Post a Comment