D a are the self-appointed media watchdogs of NDR Zapp in their four-week summer break, the time seems opportune to take a small summary of recent months.
Incessantly trying to Zapp, apparently to meet the perceived mission, the apparently clear up for quite immature and dependent citizens held. So you will not tire to get worked into almost any program on any headline in the image as if it could be used to lure someone else behind the stove. At the latest, since an alias Hans Esser Günter Wallraff looked 30 years ago in Hanover image behind the scenes and reported on, actually all know how the system works image in its fundamentals. The paid circulation of the image goes back beyond obviously continuous , so why this fear mongering? There is also an image blog is where the false representations of the image well documented and placed correctly.
It is, moreover, one of the easiest and most convenient pseudo-intellectual exercises, the image retrieval errors, inconsistencies or similar demonstrated. This is about like trying to prove the NDR every week anew that he should finance themselves through user fees. Ultimately it is the image of Zapp's criticism as to be no further charges of money-financed glass beads gimmick - a self-purposive, vain and fiddling with uninspired cliches. Besides: The intersection of the image-readers and the audience, aimed at Zapp apparently is conceivable small. It thus contributes to their viewers owls to Athens. The image reader, however, are not sooner.
Well, Zapp at least served in a beautiful regularity from the image Blog fundus, which is now to describe not just as research in the strict sense, as Zapp always demands from all other media and himself attached as a quality to her chest. Rather cheap and can be pleasantly uncomplicated fill air time by a film image blog entries. The Picture Blog founder Stefan Niggemeier is evident in his personal blog by the way it clearly unnerved that Zapp regular picture blog entries sometimes even filmed, unless otherwise specified. He called Zapp therefore not exactly unjustified even as an image blog TV. The addition of Niggemeier expressed a clear suspicion that in the course of his films Zapp also stealing ideas from him, and at best only small variations are concerned, can that be when Zapp the difference between copyright and copyleft does not know. Sure, "researched" Zapp but also even in the picture.
Otherwise Zapp often seems as trailer-show for Monitor, Panorama, Report Mainz and at extra3. The researched and produced reports from those programs will be shown in short form by Zapp. At the end of which is pointed out that one can see the full contribution of their colleagues in the broadcasts. Or you can send contributions, which have long since gone elsewhere. This kind of reminds cheaper secondary use arg to the annoying cross-promotion practice of commercial stations. But here is where your own research, for which one is knocking himself so much on the shoulder? Is this the sort of "journalistic deep hole," with the network search eV to award its prize "lighthouse for special journalistic achievements" -founded? Such kind of thin board drills journalism should Haberbusch Kuno, a board member of the Network Research Association and Zapp editor and self-promotion, according to the "King of the research," but does not allow in their own mission. As for the self-imposed standards of the network, it is possible and even its chairman, Thomas Leif to come under criticism because he is with he postulated importance of separation of PR and journalism, with the correct citation of the intellectual property of others, with the non-manipulative use of facts and research methods themselves with anything but seriously . This is a right back but its so true with Heinrich Heine verse one:
I know the way, I know the text,
I know also the author of Men;
I know they secretly drank wine
And publicly preached water.
More>